#Speedcrunch lesser or equal how to
#Speedcrunch lesser or equal Pc

And that is the problem, unless you are willing to sign a contract for 250K quantities (mobile phone) these CPU’s are not available to you at a price that is even remotely competitive with an Atom chipset. Marvel is now trying to avoid this problem by working directly with a few Chinese suppliers to make some ODM products that cannot be used in Industrial Control and therefore will protect their lucrative profits in this segment.īasically that CPU shown here has a current price that makes it completely uninteresting to use as a general PC.

#Speedcrunch lesser or equal Pc

The problem is the Industrial control segment, if they start to service the PC industry it will kill off their premium pricing on the Industrial Control segment and none of the suppliers has been willing to do so until now. – Industrial Control (High price small volume)

The ARM cpu manufacturers are a bunch of amateurs comparatively. An atom incl chipset can be had in low quantity from $30 to $50 depending on specs. They do so very well and and effectively.

#Speedcrunch lesser or equal how to

Intel and AMD knows how to sell chips to the computer / PC industry. The problem is the chip manufacturers not the ODM / OEM. You really have no idea what you are talking about… do you? It is the same reason NVidia does not get a foothold with the superior ION chipset compared to the inferior Atom offerings on Intels side. It is also the stronghold Intel and Microsoft have on the OEMs, it says a lot that you can almost find ARM everwhere where Intel does not have a grip on things. Make it half-arsed, and if it fails, put the blame on Microsoft. The HP Slate is a prime example of the incredibly cautious PC industry. But this video is certainly cause for hope that exciting new devices are on the horizon.īlame OEMs scared of doing anything new because of the recession. The current crop of ARM chips doesn’t have quite enough horsepower for a pleasant computing experience on larger mobile devices. Of course, performance is going to be important. Devices based on the Cortex-A9 will likely use the new crop of mobile OSes from Google, Intel, Nokia, etc, not to mention the innovations coming out of unknown upstarts. Of course, alternative OS fans will be cheering ARM on because Microsoft won’t be able to buy their way into the market the easy way with bargain-basement XP licenses like they did with netbooks. Even more notable is that the Intel-based netbook is running at 1.6-GHz clock frequency the dual-core Cortex-A9 development is running at 500-MHz.”Īs ARM is surely going to keep pointing out to everyone, they don’t have to beat Intel’s raw performance to make a big splash in this market, because for these kinds of devices, speed isn’t everything, and their promised power consumption advantage will surely be a major selling point. When it is considered that the netbook has a graphics processing unit and the development board does not, that is surprising result. The Intel-based netbook seemed to beat the development board to display different websites most times, but not by very much. Watch the video after the jump.Īs an EETimes article points out, “ARM set up both systems to run the same operating system, the same browser and put them on the same high-speed corporate network and checked for responsiveness to the end-user.

The Cortex-A9 is promised to have substantially better performance than the current crop of AMD processors, and a video released by AMD ARM gives a pretty convincing picture that the Cortex-A9 will have comparable performance to the Atom. Quite a bit of enthusiasm seems to be building for ARM’s upcoming processor for netbooks and other lightweight computing devices.